Skip to main content

Table 3 Detection accuracies of LDA, modified KNN and LGBM classification algorithms at the time of the CS event for all subtracted SNNr cubes

From: Prediction and detection of virtual reality induced cybersickness: a spiking neural network approach using spatiotemporal EEG brain data and heart rate variability

Detection CS onset

I–O connection

32 Channels trained

5 Channels trained

LDA

KNN

LGBM

LDA

KNN

LGBM

1471 reservoir + I–O

57.8%

70.30%

75.0%

56.3%

57.80%

65.6%

32

65.6%

75.00%

70.3%

N/A

N/A

N/A

5

50.0%

62.50%

67.2%

53.1%

62.50%

60.1%

FC6

59.4%

65.60%

62.5%

53.1%

67.20%

65.6%

Fp2

42.2%

56.30%

59.4%

43.8%

59.40%

59.4%

Fp1

46.9%

60.90%

57.8%

0.00%

64.10%

59.4%

Cz

25.0%

56.30%

54.7%

53.1%

56.0%

64.1%

O2

51.6%

53.10%

45.3%

0.00%

50.0%

59.4%

Best combo out of 5

FC6 59.4%

Fp2, Cz 68.80%

Fp1,Cz 68.8%

FC6 + Fp2 + Cz 57.8%

Fp2, Cz 68.80%

FC6,Fp1,Cz 68.8%

  1. Top accuracies are highlighted in bold