Skip to main content

Table. 2 Comparison between uGCA methods and conventional GCA under different data length

From: Robust unified Granger causality analysis: a normalized maximum likelihood form

  

uGCA-TP (%)

uGCA-MIX (%)

uGCA-NML (%)

GCA (\(\alpha =0.05\)) (%)

GCA (\(\alpha =0.01\)) (%)

\(L=150\)

   

 TPR

89.933

83.433

86.178

93.810

86.200

 TNR

99.048

99.710

99.624

95.743

98.705

 Ground-truth rate

31

17.5

22

24.4

18.5

\(L=200\)

   

 TPR

95.378

91.411

92.967

97.200

93.289

 TNR

99.181

99.748

99.705

95.610

98.610

 Ground-truth rate

56.4

41.1

48.2

29.3

40.8

\(L=300\)

   

 TPR

99.567

98.022

99.133

99.620

98.878

 TNR

99.433

99.857

99.820

98.878

98.890

 Ground-truth rate

85.5

83.0

88.9

38.3

72.1

\(L=500\)

   

 TPR

99.989

99.033

99.989

100

100

 TNR

99.324

99.824

99.786

95.186

98.571

 Ground-truth rate

86.3

91.3

95.6

34.2

72.9

  1. The data length ranges from 150 to 500, the results (\(L=1000\)) were present in Table 1, and L is the data length
  2. Bold values indicate more indicative of the method's performance