Skip to main content

Table 2 Brain areas and statistical results of Orienting Group (n = 6) with p < .03 (uncorrected) and 1055 voxels activated for zero followed by the goal and goal followed by the goal conditions: Z.G vs G.G

From: Prior context influences motor brain areas in an auditory oddball task and prefrontal cortex multitasking modelling

  Significant brain areas activated Voxels with maximum T value Brodmann areas   Significant brain areas activated Voxels with maximum T value Brodmann areas
Positive difference Positive Statistics Coordinates Negative difference Negative Statistics Coordinates
T value p value x y z T value p value x y z
Frontal lobes Frontal lobes
1 L MedialFrontal Gyrus 5.26 .002 − 1 − 24 59 6 1 L MedialFrontal Gyrus 4.47 0.0033 − 12 39 23  
2 L ParacentralLobule 2.71 .021 − 2 − 29 59 6         
3 R InferiorFrontal Gyrus 14.80 < .001 23 28 − 10 47         
4 R MedialFrontal Gyrus 3.66 .007 4 − 26 58 6         
5 R MiddleFrontal Gyrus 22.96 < .001 24 26 − 11 11         
6 R ParacentralLobule 5.76 .001 10 − 29 57 3,31,5,6         
7 R PostcentralGyrus 3.88 .006 17 − 34 61 4         
8 R PrecentralGyrus 4.83 .002 18 − 15 66 4,6         
9 R SuperiorFrontal Gyrus 5.36 .002 28 − 7 66 6         
Parietal lobes Parietal lobes
10 L PostcentralGyrus 3.22 .012 − 57 − 27 19 40         
11 L Precuneus 7.89 < .001 − 18 − 73 23 31         
12 R AngularGyrus 7.43 < .001 50 − 68 34 39         
13 R InferiorParietal Lobule 7.42 < .001 54 − 58 40 39,40         
14 R PostcentralGyrus 3.76 .007 13 − 34 63 3         
15 R Precuneus 4.12 .005 44 − 71 41 19,39         
Temporal lobes Temporal lobes
16 L MiddleTemporal Gyrus 7.71 < .001 − 60 − 30 2 19,21,22,39         
17 L SuperiorTemporal Gyrus 10.07 < .001 − 50 − 31 3 21,22,41,42         
18 L TransverseTemporal Gyrus 5.80 .001 − 41 − 32 11 41         
19 R MiddleTemporal Gyrus 3.83 .006 46 − 63 27 39         
20 R SuperiorTemporal Gyrus 5.86 .001 38 − 55 17 13,22,41,42         
21 R TransverseTemporal Gyrus 3.49 .009 51 − 24 10 41         
Occipital lobes         
22 L Cuneus 15.58 < .001 − 15 − 79 27 18,19,7 2 R FusiformGyrus 5.35 0.0015 28 − 48 − 7 37
23 L Precuneus 9.50 < .001 − 19 − 77 28 31 3 R ParahippocampalGyrus 4.96 0.0021 26 − 48 − 9 37
24 L SuperiorOccipital Gyrus 5.27 .002 − 35 − 83 29 19         
25 R MiddleTemporal Gyrus 7.69 < .001 39 − 58 16 19         
26 R Precuneus 3.97 .005 14 − 72 26 31         
Limbic lobes         
27 L CingulateGyrus 6.94 < .001 − 10 − 55 28 31 4 L AnteriorCingulate 3.38 0.0098 − 12 36 24 32
28 L PosteriorCingulate 11.93 < .001 − 6 − 57 25 31 5 R ParahippocampalGyrus 3.80 0.0063 31 − 47 − 6 19
29 L Precuneus 4.98 .002 − 12 − 43 37 31         
Deep gray (Sub lobar areas) Deep gray (Sub lobar areas)
30 L LentiformNucleus 3.04 .014 − 15 − 5 4   6 R ThalamusPulvinar 6.94 0.0005 9 − 30 9  
31 L LentiformNucleusLateralGlobus Pallidus 4.02 .005 − 14 0 1          
32 L LentiformNucleusMedialGlobus Pallidus 3.59 .008 − 11 0 − 1          
33 L LentiformNucleusPutamen 3.36 .01 − 18 1 3          
34 L Thalamus 6.25 < .001 − 9 − 9 1          
35 L ThalamusMammillary Body 3.16 .012 − 13 − 20 2          
36 L ThalamusMedial DorsalNucleus 4.15 .004 − 7 − 20 3          
37 L ThalamusVentral AnteriorNucleus 3.19 .012 − 16 − 8 12          
38 L ThalamusVentral LateralNucleus 6.74 < .001 − 10 − 9 3          
39 L ThalamusVentral PosteriorLateral Nucleus 2.96 .016 − 17 − 22 1          
40 L ThalamusVentral PosteriorMedial Nucleus 3.24 .011 − 14 − 21 0          
41 R Claustrum 6.28 < .001 36 − 19 4          
42 R Insula 5.14 .002 41 − 18 4 13         
43 R LentiformNucleusPutamen 4.37 .004 24 1 14          
44 R Thalamus 19.51 < .001 10 − 24 0          
  Additional regions        Additional regions
45 L MidbrainSubstania Nigra 5.64 .001 − 14 − 21 − 6   7 L Anterior LobeCulmen 2.94 0.016 − 1 − 46 − 6  
46 R MidbrainRed Nucleus 3.58 .008 8 − 20 − 6   8 R Anterior LobeCulmen 3.65 0.0074 2 − 44 − 5  
47 R MidbrainSubstania Nigra 4.06 .005 11 − 22 − 7          
  1. Anatomical labels and associated T statistical values are listed. t scores from the omnibus analyses of 6 participants for each ROI are presented