Skip to main content

Table 8 Comparison of optimal designs for the 200-bar spatial truss structure

From: Improved fruit fly algorithm on structural optimization

Bar group numberBar section area (unit: m2)
IAPSOFOAIAFOA
A10.29980.30780.44390.2879
A20.55640.45711.04380.4853
A30.28670.10060.37690.1002
A40.19080.10060.14940.1002
A50.83290.50930.48350.4985
A60.65980.82770.81030.8038
A70.17790.10510.23640.1031
A81.47941.43391.45541.3769
A90.44620.10131.01030.1000
A101.45661.54972.13821.5541
A111.22951.15350.85831.1507
A120.27940.14691.27180.1332
A131.92792.94922.08073.0109
A140.11790.11110.26770.1005
A153.44353.21993.24033.2584
A161.39531.57962.00981.6205
A170.62880.29011.59560.2079
A184.89375.10026.23385.0203
A190.60930.11010.57930.1328
A205.43975.45943.05204.8531
A211.84392.90071.81212.0138
A221.42730.64891.29860.7201
A238.17027.65925.88107.7219
A240.32710.13790.23240.1819
A2510.9028.00977.75368.9438
A262.93592.76022.68712,9953
A2719.532910.476510.269410.2049
A2820.976821.350121.570420.6507
A2915.730110.50148.290111.5468
Weight (kg)2298.732276.592259.862156.05
\