Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 2 Correlations between sulcal depth and age for each sulci and hemisphere, for each of the three lifespan datasets examined

From: Robust estimation of sulcal morphology

Sulci name FreeSurfer labela Hemi. OASIS DLBS SALD CCBD
r (age) r (age) r (age) ICC (1,1) 95% CI of ICC
Central S_central L − .517 − .205 − .346 .848 [ 0.772, 0.912]
R − .505 − .256 − .348 .860 [ 0.789, 0.919]
Post-central S_postcentral L − .371 − .264 − .268 .965 [ 0.944, 0.981]
R − .436 − .246 − .330 .890 [ 0.831, 0.937]
Superior frontal S_front_sup L − .523 − .454 − .397 .899 [ 0.844, 0.943]
R − .413 − .465 − .444 .886 [ 0.825, 0.935]
Inferior frontal S_front_inf L − .517 − .490 − .491 .932 [ 0.893, 0.962]
R − .496 − .480 − .490 .915 [ 0.868, 0.952]
Parieto-occipital S_parieto_occipital L − .145 − .093 − .241 .979 [ 0.966, 0.989]
R − .124 .059 − .229 .970 [ 0.952, 0.984]
Occipito-temporal S_oc-temp_med&Lingual L − .509 − .323 − .263 .953 [ 0.926, 0.974]
R − .404 − .316 − .281 .913 [ 0.864, 0.951]
Middle occipital and lunate S_oc_middle&Lunatus L − .290 − .167 − .150 .949 [ 0.919, 0.972]
R − .288 − .120 − .132 .922 [ 0.879, 0.956]
Marginal part of cingulate S_cingul-Marginalis L − .092 − .035 − .268 .952 [ 0.925, 0.974]
R − .032 − .017 − .156 .918 [ 0.872, 0.954]
Mean    − .465 − .645 − .600 .972 [ 0.955, 0.985]
  1. Test–retest reliability, ICC(1, 1), is also included from the CCBD dataset
  2. aFreeSurfer labels in version 6.0; labels are named slightly different in version 5.3. ICC values between .75 and 1.00 are considered ‘excellent,’ .60–.74 is ‘good,’ .40–.59 is ‘fair,’ and below .40 is ‘poor’ [100]