Skip to main content

Table 1 Reconstruction results with different methods on two datasets

From: Optshrink LR + S: accelerated fMRI reconstruction using non-convex optimal singular value shrinkage

Dataset

Method

NMSE

PSNR

6 lines

12 lines

24 lines

6 lines

12 lines

24 lines

Task-based dataset

Direct IFT

0.3088

0.2177

0.1595

3.54

6.58

9.63

CS with wavelet sparsity [13]

0.2435

0.219

0.138

4.828

7.79

12.07

LR + S [15]

0.1992

0.1215

0.0699

6.583

10.87

15.67

Proposed Optshrink LR + S (r = 1)

0.0497

0.0442

0.0401

18.62

19.65

20.49

Proposed Optshrink LR + S (r = 2)

0.0501

0.0437

0.0401

18.571

19.76

20.49

Proposed Optshrink LR + S (r = 3)

0.0496

0.0435

0.0401

18.649

19.78

20.49

Resting-state dataset

Direct IFT

0.4067

0.286

0.1979

2.93

6.09

9.415

CS with wavelet sparsity [13]

0.2917

0.2054

0.1193

5.42

8.465

13.19

LR + S [15]

0.2351

0.1198

0.0576

7.321

13.16

19.52

Proposed Optshrink LR + S (r = 1)

0.0469

0.0359

0.031

21.32

23.64

24.91

Proposed Optshrink LR + S (r = 2)

0.0462

0.036

0.0311

21.44

23.62

24.88

Proposed Optshrink LR + S (r = 3)

0.0473

0.0364

0.0312

21.24

23.52

24.85

  1. Task-based data—false belief task fMRI data, subject no. 1, results on slice number 18, averaged over all time points
  2. Resting-state data—Baltimore fMRI data, subject no. 1, results on slice number 24, averaged over all time points